A quasar so bright it drowns out its own galaxy, powered by a black hole that shouldn’t have had time to grow.
Updated July 2026. This piece revisits our 2021 article on TON 618 with corrected distance figures, the disputed black-hole mass, and where it now sits among the record-holders.
What would it take for a single object to outshine an entire galaxy of a hundred billion stars? Welcome, curious reader. Today we’re travelling to one of the strangest addresses in the sky, and we’d love you to stay with us to the end, because the most interesting part of this story isn’t how big TON 618 is. It’s how little we can actually pin that number down.
The direct answer
TON 618 is a hyperluminous quasar in Canes Venatici whose light has travelled about 10.8 billion years to reach us. It is powered by a black hole estimated at 40 to 66 billion times the Sun’s mass, making it one of the most massive ever measured, though the exact figure depends on which spectral line astronomers trust.
The TON 618 black hole is one of the most massive ever measured, weighing somewhere between 40 and 66 billion times the mass of our Sun. It sits at the heart of a brilliant quasar in the constellation Canes Venatici, and its light left when the universe was roughly a quarter of its present age. That single spread of figures, from 40 to 66 billion, is the whole story, so let’s walk through it together.
What exactly is TON 618?
TON 618 is a quasar, the blazing core of a distant galaxy where gas spirals into a giant black hole and heats up until it glows brighter than everything around it. The name is short for Tonantzintla 618. Mexican astronomers Braulio Iriarte and Enrique Chavira first catalogued it in 1957 from photographic plates taken with a small Schmidt telescope, where it showed up as a faint, oddly violet dot. They assumed it was a dead white dwarf star in our own galaxy’s halo.
They had no way of knowing better. Quasars weren’t recognised as a class until 1963. The real breakthrough came in 1970, when a radio survey at Bologna picked up strong emissions from the same spot, and Marie-Helene Ulrich later took spectra at the McDonald Observatory in Texas. Those spectra carried a huge redshift, the fingerprint of an object very far away and, given how bright it still looked, extraordinarily luminous. You can read more in our guide to how quasars and active galactic nuclei light up.
How far away is TON 618?
TON 618’s light has been travelling for roughly 10.8 billion years, so we see it as it was when the universe was young. That “look-back” figure is the one worth holding onto. Our 2021 write-up quoted 10.4 billion light-years; the small difference comes down to which cosmological parameters you plug in, and 10.8 billion years is the value most current sources settle on.
Here’s the part that trips people up. Because space itself has stretched during that long journey, the quasar is now much farther away than 10.8 billion light-years. Measured as it sits today, its comoving distance is about 18.2 billion light-years. Both numbers are correct; they just answer different questions. One asks how long the light travelled, the other asks where the object is right now. If that distinction feels slippery, our explainer on the true size of the observable universe unpacks it properly.
~10.8billion years of light travel
z = 2.22measured redshift
~140 tntimes the Sun’s luminosity
Is it 66 billion Suns, or closer to 40?
Both figures come from real, careful studies, and the honest answer is that we don’t measure the mass directly at all. A black hole this distant is a point of darkness we can never resolve. What astronomers actually measure is how fast gas whips around near the black hole, read from the width of emission lines in its spectrum, and then convert that speed into a mass using the physics of orbits.
The famous 66-billion-solar-mass figure comes from a 2004 study by Ohad Shemmer and colleagues, based on the width of the Hβ emission line. In 2019, Xu Ge and colleagues reworked the same object using a different line, C IV, and found the gas moving more slowly, around 2,760 km/s rather than the faster Hβ velocities. Slower gas means a weaker gravitational grip, and so a lighter black hole: about 40.7 billion Suns.
Which is right? Nobody can say with certainty. C IV is known to be distorted by powerful outflows in quasars, which can inflate or deflate the apparent velocity. Hβ is cleaner but harder to observe at this redshift. This is exactly the kind of genuine uncertainty we’d rather show you than hide. The single black hole may be more massive than every star in the Milky Way combined (about 64 billion solar masses), or it may be roughly two-thirds of that. The measurement, not the object, is what’s fuzzy.
How big is the TON 618 black hole’s event horizon?
The event horizon, the point of no return, has a radius of roughly 1,300 astronomical units if the black hole really is 66 billion Suns. That’s about 195 billion kilometres, or more than 40 times the distance from Neptune to the Sun. Drop TON 618 into our solar system and its horizon would swallow every planet many times over. You don’t need to take that on faith, though. You can work it out yourself.
The event horizon size follows a clean formula, the Schwarzschild radius:
R = 2GM / c²
A handy shortcut: every solar mass adds about 2.95 km to the radius. So:
At 66 billion Suns: 2.95 km × 6.6×1010 ≈ 195 billion km ≈ 1,300 AU (radius). At 40.7 billion Suns: 2.95 km × 4.07×1010 ≈ 120 billion km ≈ 800 AU (radius).
Notice the payoff: the disputed mass changes the horizon’s width by roughly 500 AU, wider than the entire planetary solar system, just from choosing one emission line over another.
How could it grow so large, so early?
That’s the deepest puzzle TON 618 hands us, and it remains unsolved. At redshift 2.2, we’re seeing the quasar as it looked only about three billion years after the Big Bang. Ordinary accretion, where a black hole feeds on surrounding gas at a steady, radiation-limited pace, struggles to build tens of billions of solar masses in that little time. Something had to speed things up.
Two ideas lead the field. In the first, these giants skip the slow start by forming from the direct collapse of enormous primordial gas clouds, beginning life already heavy. In the second, they feed in bursts that briefly break the usual brightness limit, gorging faster than the textbook allows. The James Webb Space Telescope has since found other black holes that look impossibly heavy for their age, which tells us TON 618 was an early warning, not a one-off. Our overview of how supermassive black holes are built goes deeper into both routes.
Is TON 618 still the biggest we know?
As of 2026, TON 618 still holds the crown for the most massive black hole with a widely accepted estimate, but the title is genuinely contested. It has company at the top, and some of the challengers were measured with methods that don’t rely on quasar spectral lines at all.
How TON 618 compares with other well-studied giants. Masses are estimates and carry sizeable uncertainties.
Black hole
Host / system
Estimated mass (Suns)
How it was weighed
Sagittarius A*
Milky Way centre
~4.3 million
Direct stellar orbits
M87*
Galaxy M87
~6.5 billion
Event Horizon Telescope image
Cosmic Horseshoe BH
Lensing galaxy (2025)
~36 billion
Gravitational lensing + dynamics
TON 618 (C IV, 2019)
Quasar
~40.7 billion
C IV line width (virial)
TON 618 (Hβ, 2004)
Quasar
~66 billion
Hβ line width (virial)
Phoenix A*, at the centre of the Phoenix Cluster, is sometimes floated as larger, but its mass estimates swing wildly and stay poorly constrained. The 2025 discovery of a 36-billion-solar-mass black hole in the Cosmic Horseshoe lens is notable precisely because lensing gives a cleaner weigh-in than quasar lines do. None of these clearly beats TON 618 yet. For a sense of scale, compare it with the first black hole ever imaged in our piece on the Event Horizon Telescope’s portrait of M87.
One more marvel before we go: TON 618 isn’t just a black hole. It’s wrapped in a Lyman-alpha blob, a cloud of glowing hydrogen roughly 330,000 light-years across, more than twice the width of the Milky Way. The quasar’s radiation lights it up like a lantern in fog. The host galaxy itself? Still invisible, completely outshone by the monster at its core.
The takeaway
TON 618 gives us a rare kind of honesty. Its distance splits into two right answers depending on the question you ask. Its mass splits into two right answers depending on the spectral line you trust. And its very existence, so massive so early, still outruns our best formation models. The monster is real; our certainty about its dimensions is not, and saying so out loud is what science looks like.
This article was written specifically for you by FreeAstroScience.com, where we explain complex scientific principles in simple terms. Come back and explore with us again, and above all, we want you never to switch off your mind, because the sleep of reason breeds monsters.
Gerd Dani
Frequently asked questions
How far away is TON 618?
TON 618’s light has travelled roughly 10.8 billion years to reach us, so we see it as it was in the young universe. Because space kept expanding during that journey, the quasar now sits about 18.2 billion light-years away in comoving distance.
How massive is the TON 618 black hole?
Estimates range from about 40.7 to 66 billion times the Sun’s mass. The higher figure comes from a 2004 study of the Hβ emission line; a 2019 reanalysis using the C IV line found a lower gas velocity, and so a smaller mass. Both are indirect.
Why do the mass estimates disagree?
The mass is inferred from how fast gas swirls near the black hole, read off the width of spectral lines. Different lines, Hβ versus C IV, give different velocities, and outflows can distort C IV. That choice alone shifts the answer by tens of billions of solar masses.
Is TON 618 the largest black hole in the universe?
TON 618 is still the most massive black hole with a widely accepted direct estimate, but the title is contested. Phoenix A* has debated figures, and a 2025 lensing study weighed a nearby giant at about 36 billion Suns. No confirmed object clearly beats TON 618 yet.
Could we ever see TON 618’s host galaxy?
Probably not with today’s telescopes. The quasar outshines everything around it by so much that the host galaxy’s starlight is drowned out completely. Astronomers detect the surrounding gas, including a vast Lyman-alpha cloud about 330,000 light-years wide, but the galaxy itself stays hidden.
Sources
Shemmer, O. et al. (2004). Near-infrared spectroscopy of high-redshift luminous quasars, The Astrophysical Journal. Hβ-based mass estimate (~66 billion M☉).
Ge, X. et al. (2019). Reanalysis of TON 618 using the C IV emission line, giving a lower mass (~40.7 billion M☉).
Iriarte, B. & Chavira, E. (1957). Tonantzintla Catalogue of faint blue stars, Tonantzintla Observatory, Mexico.
Ulrich, M.-H. (1976). Optical spectroscopy of TON 618, McDonald Observatory.
Melo-Carneiro, C. R. et al. (2025). Unveiling a 36-billion-solar-mass black hole in the Cosmic Horseshoe gravitational lens, arXiv:2502.13788.
Guinness World Records & NASA Goddard reference materials on the most massive observed black hole.
BBC Sky at Night Magazine (2025). Feature on TON 618 and the Lyman-alpha blob (~330,000 light-years).
Gerd Dani — Founder & Director Gerd Dani is the visionary in a wheelchair behind FreeAstroScience. An astronomy graduate and a master's in physics, he founded this blog in June 2020, driven by a passion for breaking down complex scientific and philosophical concepts into bite-sized, digestible pieces. As President, he is dedicated to making science accessible to everyone, from students to seasoned academics.
(()=>{async function handleCredentialResponse(response){try{const res=await fetch('https://freeastroscience.com/wp-login.php?action=googlesitekit_auth',{method:'POST',headers:{'Content-Type':'application/x-www-form-urlencoded'},body:new URLSearchParams(response)});/* Preserve comment text in case of redirect after login on a page with a Sign in with Google button in the WordPress comments. */ const commentText=document.querySelector('#comment')?.value;const postId=document.querySelectorAll('.googlesitekit-sign-in-with-google__comments-form-button')?.[0]?.className?.match(/googlesitekit-sign-in-with-google__comments-form-button-postid-(\d+)/)?.[1];if(!! commentText?.length){sessionStorage.setItem(`siwg-comment-text-${postId}`,commentText);}location.reload();}catch(error){console.error(error);}}if(typeof google !=='undefined'){google.accounts.id.initialize({client_id:'251104905146-eghigrtua82ec7aan4em9fle9u5f0ilc.apps.googleusercontent.com',callback:handleCredentialResponse,library_name:'Site-Kit'});}const defaultButtonOptions={"theme":"outline","text":"signin_with","shape":"rectangular"};document.querySelectorAll('.googlesitekit-sign-in-with-google__frontend-output-button').forEach((siwgButtonDiv)=>{const buttonOptions={shape:siwgButtonDiv.getAttribute('data-googlesitekit-siwg-shape')|| defaultButtonOptions.shape,text:siwgButtonDiv.getAttribute('data-googlesitekit-siwg-text')|| defaultButtonOptions.text,theme:siwgButtonDiv.getAttribute('data-googlesitekit-siwg-theme')|| defaultButtonOptions.theme,};if(typeof google !=='undefined'){google.accounts.id.renderButton(siwgButtonDiv,buttonOptions);}});/* If there is a matching saved comment text in sessionStorage,restore it to the comment field and remove it from sessionStorage. */ const postId=document.body.className.match(/postid-(\d+)/)?.[1];const commentField=document.querySelector('#comment');const commentText=sessionStorage.getItem(`siwg-comment-text-${postId}`);if(commentText?.length && commentField && !! postId){commentField.value=commentText;sessionStorage.removeItem(`siwg-comment-text-${postId}`);}})();
var astra = {"break_point":"921","isRtl":"","is_scroll_to_id":"1","is_scroll_to_top":"1","is_header_footer_builder_active":"1","responsive_cart_click":"flyout","is_dark_palette":"","revealEffectEnable":"","edit_post_url":"https://freeastroscience.com/wp-admin/post.php?post={{id}}&action=edit","ajax_url":"https://freeastroscience.com/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php","infinite_count":"2","infinite_total":"0","pagination":"number","infinite_scroll_event":"scroll","no_more_post_message":"No more posts to show.","grid_layout":{"desktop":3,"tablet":1,"mobile":1},"site_url":"https://freeastroscience.com","blogArchiveTitleLayout":"layout-2","blogArchiveTitleOn":"1","show_comments":"Show Comments","enableHistoryPushState":"1","masonryEnabled":"","blogMasonryBreakPoint":"0"};
//# sourceURL=astra-theme-js-js-extra